Does your coding agent produce incomplete or buggy outputs?

Homer automatically checks your AI coding agent's completed work, estimates how likely it is to be finished, and tells the agent what work is left. The whole process takes about 10 seconds.

  • 3 minute install
  • $10 free credit
  • No card upfront
Start with $10 free credit See proof
Homer changes when the agent is allowed to stop.

Same task. Better final output.

Same task, same agent. Homer only changes the moment before "done": it tells the agent whether it can stop and what to do next.

Real side-by-side run: baseline stops with the wrong result, Homer keeps the agent working toward the correct one.

Completion checkpoint example

A simplified example of what Homer sends back to the agent when the evidence is not strong enough yet.

20m 30s Worked for 20 minutes, 30 seconds
Agent All set. I added the retry handling and the checks I ran are passing.
Homer Confidence: 55%. Still uncertain because the API shape changed, but there is no evidence the generated TypeScript client was refreshed or that the new retry path is covered by tests.
Agent Good catch. I updated the API contract but did not regenerate the TypeScript client or prove the retry branch, so I am going back through that now.
Agent Regenerated the client and added a retry-path test. The API-shape risk is covered now.
Homer Confidence: 97%. Output looks great now.

A 10-second checkpoint before "done"

  1. Agent works

    Your coding agent edits files, runs commands, and gathers evidence in the normal loop.

  2. Homer estimates completion

    Before the agent claims the task is finished, Homer reads the current evidence, returns calibrated uncertainty, and names the unfinished work.

  3. Improve or finish

    High confidence -> ship the answer. Low confidence -> the agent fixes gaps, verifies, and checks again.

Enhance your agent

Start with $10 free credit, no card upfront, and add Homer to Claude Code, Cursor, or Codex in a few minutes.

Start with $10 free credit Read FAQ

Agent vs Agent + Homer

Early in-house Terminus-2 comparison - same tasks, same agent, Homer only checks whether the agent is ready to finish.

Correct final completions

Agent
Agent + Homer

14% better with Homer

Premature/hallucinated completions

Agent
Agent + Homer

44% reduction with Homer

Common questions

Is Homer just an LLM wrapper?

No. LLMs are often overconfident, and they are frequently blinded by their commitment to mistakes. We have developed a proprietary architecture to mitigate these weaknesses. It measurably provides superior calibration compared to LLM-as-a-judge, while also preventing errors that LLM-as-a-judge would not have caught.

What does Homer actually do?

It checks whether the current user request looks truly complete from the evidence in the turn, then tells the agent whether it can stop and what work is left before the final answer.

Do I need a credit card?

No. Setup includes $10 free credit, no card upfront, and takes about three minutes.

Which agents are supported?

Claude Code, Cursor, and Codex today. Same Homer API and install flow across all three.

Does Homer replace my agent?

No. Homer is a completion layer on top - the agent still writes code; Homer checks whether the work is actually ready to stop.